Institution of Learning Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Institution of Learning - face Study ExampleSecondly, the fact that Steven is senior in the college, creative, but hates having to write reports or deliver presentation, it big businessman interfere with his contribution to the development and presentation of the project. Third, Erick made certain alteration of some of the wording in the report and added different information, making a number of parts to sound unoriginal without consulting the other twain members, thus breaching the spirit up of a team (Shepard, 2005). Fourth, Kelly is in an aggressive quest to relocate to Oregon soonest possible to be close to her fiance and intends to switch her career. Perhaps, she was adhering to agency theory that indicates the relationship between motive and the individual workers productivity. It seems the workers are not motivated, thus could not work as a team because the perception from their interaction is that each operates on his/her stimulate (Shepard, 2005). This fact could inter fere with the group spirit since she might not be interested in the outcome of the project, contrary to the goal of the group initiative. The racing shell also revealed that Steven, Eric and Kelly decided that they could individually self-organize and let each other prepare for the presentation in his/her own fashion. This contravenes the group spirit since they were to agree on all aspects of the project, create a sense of understanding on each of them, on the full report and finally give one of them the opportunity to do the presentation. This would be important because, allowing each person to present in his/her own fashion could give room for use of the content to their personal interest and satisfaction, perhaps not for the Institution (Shepard, 2005). The key Problems in this Case at that place are certain line of works in this case ranging from personal to technological in nature. For example, there tree lag members lack coordination since they do not interact during the ir duties. To substantiate this claim, the Steven and Kelly could not prepare the ten questions, which they agreed on for the interview, citing their own reason for failing to do so. Steve only had five questions while Kelly did not present questions at all, claiming that the system could not open her document to print the questions. Indeed, this posted a big challenge in executing a groups project and should be addressed, if the three staff members wanted to make headway in the initiative (Shepard, 2005). Moreover, after deliberation on the project, Erick prepared the final draft and sent a copy to the IT Director and Mark for their review. Surprisingly, he did this without consulting Steven and Kelly for their comment on the final draft. Therefore, the two could not digest the content of the final draft, subsequently creating a problem during its presentation (Shepard, 2005). As given in the case, Kelly open up at least two flaws in the final draft, which did not make sense for her, but had no choice since the final copy had reached the IT Director and Mark who initially did not have any problem with the document. The second problem is sequence keeping. The case information stated that Steve and Kelly could not report in time for the presentation, despite Ericks effort to arrive 30 minutes earlier. Kelly